Summary

Owen J. Roberts Stewart v. Southern Railway Company…

Yet no inspector nor anyone else was called by the railroad to give testimony on the condition of the pin lifter immediately after the accident. [5] Under these circumstances, reasonable jurors are not to be denied the right to make inferences which other reasonable people would make: that Stogner tried in the usual way to couple the cars; that his efforts were unsuccessful; and that he was therefore compelled to go between the cars to effect a coupling. And they could therefore have concluded that the pin lifter was defective. The jury's finding of this fact should not have been disturbed.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature