Summary

Peter Vivian Daniel Gwin v. Breedlove (43 U.S. 29)…

But whether or not the conduct of the marshal can in literal strictness be denominated a failure or refusal to levy or to return an execution, it is surely not a failure or refusal to pay over money actually levied, and, therefore, the proceeding, under color of the statute of Mississippi, is not the proceeding appropriate to the act of the officer, however that act may be characterized.
Source: Wikisource

Peter Vivian Daniel Gwin v. Breedlove (43 U.S. 29)…

But if a farther or different recourse is sought against the marshal, one which may be supposed to arise neither from the inherent power of the court over its peculiar officer, or its judgments; then it is presumed that those who seek such recourse, must show their right as arising out of their character to sue in the federal courts; they must show themselves by regular averment to be citizens of a state other than that of him whom they seek to implead.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature