“ I think we should define a common flow for what properties to check. I think in the most part we can not worry about what namespace we're checking from because the properties are prioritized (e.g. if a category has category's main topic (P301) and main subject (P921) defined, we use the former) . So, for any page in any Wikisource NS:Use sitelink if a direct one exists. For 'Wikidata' sister links, only ever use direct sitelink. ”
Quotes from Plain sister ()
“ I'm not very bright but I had no problem being led by the nose to the Author: page for Alfred Tennyson and then jumping to WP from that page's sister-project link for example. Seriously, I don't see much benefit from corrupting the sister-links scheme in place with the addition of such an incestuous link (i.e. different namespace, same Wiki) . I agree that {{wikisource-author}} is not very pretty; maybe it needs a streamlined version akin to "plain sister's" size, position and function to send idiots like me to the Author: page before introducing the option to jump elsewhere next. ”
“ Thoughts about header linking for "other" authors Been trying to think how best to do a leading/highlighting link for works about authors from the main namespace, eg. at Canon Kingsley the only way to locally link is via a standard link in the body of the work, and that can get lost in the text. Whereas we have work about and by this bloke, so in some ways it should have a similar relevance as an interwiki link like we do with {{plain sister}}. On a few pages, I have seen {{wikisource-author}} used and it is butt ugly. ”
