Summary

Robert H. Jackson United States v. Commodities Trading Corporation Commodities Trading Corporation…

I said there:
'It is hard to see how just compensation can be the legal equivalent of a controlled price, unless a controlled price is also always required to equal just compensation. It never has been held that in regulating a commodity price the Government is bound to fix one that is adequately compensatory in the constitutional sense, so long as the owner is free to keep his property or to put it on the market as he chooses.
Source: Wikisource

Robert H. Jackson United States v. Commodities Trading Corporation Commodities Trading Corporation…

It also makes the constitutional provision for just compensation meaningless since the Government may first fix the price, as if no sales were compelled, and then compel the sales at the prices so fixed. I think the constitutional power to fix prices for voluntary sale in interstate commerce is much less confined than the power to fix prices for taking property.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature