Summary

Portrait of Roger B. Taney Roger B. Taney United States v. Pillerin — Opinion of the Court

For all of the grants are absolute, or upon conditions subsequent; and if they had been originally made by competent authority, would have passed the legal title at the time, subject only to be divested by a breach of the condition, in the cases where a condition subsequent is annexed. Such a title, if afterwards recognized by the Spanish authorities, is protected by the treaty, and is independent of any legislation by Congress, and requires no proceeding in a court of the United States to give it validity.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Roger B. Taney Roger B. Taney United States v. Pillerin — Opinion of the Court

These laws were passed to enable persons who had only an inchoate and equitable title, to obtain an absolute and legal one, by proceeding in the District Court in the manner prescribed. And when the title under which the party claims, would be a complete and absolute one, if granted by competent authority or established by proof, the District Courts have no jurisdiction under the acts of Congress above mentioned to decide upon its validity.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature