Summary

Portrait of Roger B. Taney Roger B. Taney United States v. Woolsey — Opinion of the Court

No objection has been made to it either in the court below, or in this Court, on the part of the defendants; and we think the United States may be considered as the real party; although, in form, it is the information and complaint of the district attorney. But, although we have come to the conclusion that the proceeding is valid, and ought to be sustained by the Court, it is certainly desirable that the practice should be uniform in the courts of the United States
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Roger B. Taney Roger B. Taney United States v. Woolsey — Opinion of the Court

The bank denies, in its answer, that it had notice of the mortgage in question, at the time it purchased and obtained the conveyances; and there is no evidence in the record to charge them with notice. It purchased and obtained the deeds, as above stated, before the mortgage was recorded. No money was paid by the bank, on the purchase, except for expenses of sale and costs.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature