Summary

Samuel Blatchford West v. Camden — Opinion of the Court

The agreement alleged was an agreement which bound the defendant as to his future action as a director of the Baltimore United Oil Company, and an agreement to keep the plaintiff permanently in the position of vice-president of that company, irrespective of its interests. It amounted to a stipulation on the part of the defendant that no contingency should happen which should require a change of management and a reduction of expenses. The principle involved is well settled in regard to public employments.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature