Samuel Freeman Miller,
Barings v. Dabney — Concurrence
“ Hence the repeal of the act by the legislature, in 1868, was no disturbance of any vested rights, and it is not obnoxious to the objection that it impaired the obligation of any contract. For this reason, and for this reason alone, I think the judgment should be affirmed.Justices MILLER and DAVIS expressed their concurrence in what was said by Mr. Justice Strong. ”
