Summary

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Healy v. Joliet — Opinion of the Court

On this question of disputed fact, so far as we have any right to inquire into it under this writ of error, we concur in the opinion held by the supreme court and by the circuit court, and do not deem it necessary to set out in this opinion a comparison or examination of the evidence, which is voluminous, as it can serve no good purpose.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Healy v. Joliet — Opinion of the Court

This bridge is alleged to be an obstruction to the navigation of the slough, and therefore a nuisance, in regard to which plaintiffs suffer special damage, as owners of certain real estate situated above the bridge, which obstructs the access of vessels coming from Lake Michigan or from the Chicago river through that river and through the slough to plaintiffs' lots.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature