Summary

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Silver v. Ladd (74 U.S. 219) — Opinion of the Court

Can there be any reason why a married woman, who has the care and protection of a husband, and who is incapable of making a separate settlement and cultivation, shall have land given to her own use, while the unprotected female, above the age of eighteen years, who makes her own settlement and cultivation, shall be excluded?
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Samuel Freeman Miller Samuel Freeman Miller Silver v. Ladd (74 U.S. 219) — Opinion of the Court

The most usual mode under the chancery practice, unaffected by statute, is to compel the defendant, in person, to convey to plaintiff, or to have such conveyance made in his name, by a commissioner appointed by the court for that purpose. In some of the States it is provided by statute that a decree of the court shall operate as a conveyance where it is so expressed in the decree, and additional relief may be granted by giving possession of the land to plaintiff, quieting his title as against defendants, and enjoining them from asserting theirs.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature