Samuel Freeman Miller,
Wells v. Nickles — Opinion of the Court
“ Their authority to act for the government, and the ownership of the property which they asserted a right to seize, were questions eminently proper to be decided by a court, especially a court of the United States. If it were otherwise, all the property of the citizens of this vast country would be held at the pleasure of any one bold enough to assert that it is government property and he a government agent.The effort we have made to ascertain and fix the authority of these timber agents by any positive provision of law has been unsuccessful. ”
