Summary

Portrait of Sandra Day O'Connor Sandra Day O'Connor Stenberg v. Carhart — Concurring Opinion

If Nebraska's statute limited its application to the D&X procedure and included an exception for the life and health of the mother, the question presented would be quite different than the one we face today. As we held in Casey, an abortion regulation constitutes an undue burden if it "has the purpose or effect of placing a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion of a nonviable fetus."
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Sandra Day O'Connor Sandra Day O'Connor Stenberg v. Carhart — Concurring Opinion

The issue of abortion is one of the most contentious and controversial in contemporary American society. It presents extraordinarily difficult questions that, as the Court recognizes, involve "virtually irreconcilable points of view." Ante, at 921. The specific question we face today is whether Nebraska's attempt to proscribe a particular method of abortion, commonly known as "partial-birth abortion," is constitutional. For the reasons stated in the Court's opinion, I agree that Nebraska's statute cannot be reconciled with our decision in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature