Summary

Portrait of Stephen Johnson Field Stephen Johnson Field National Bank v. Whitney — Opinion of the Court

If the mortgage for the future indebtedness can be sustained as a valid instrument for that purpose, the entire surplus will be absorbed for its payment, excepting such portion as may be first payable to McCormick, by reason of the fact that he took his mortgage without notice of the one to the bank. It is contended that the mortgage to the bank, so far as it applies to future advances, is invalid, because a mortgage of that character is prohibited by the national banking law.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stephen Johnson Field Stephen Johnson Field National Bank v. Whitney — Opinion of the Court

Judicial decisions affecting the business interests of the country should not be disturbed except for the most cogent reasons, certainly not because of subsequent doubts as to their soundness. The prosperity of a commercial community depends, in a great degree, upon the stability of the rules by which its transactions are governed.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Stephen Johnson Field Stephen Johnson Field National Bank v. Whitney — Opinion of the Court

It cites the statute of the State to show that the recording act gives priority only to the mortgage first recorded, when that is executed for a valuable consideration, which, according to those decisions, means some new consideration advanced at the time; and that a mortgage for a pre-existing indebtedness is not protected by a prior record, against a non-recorded mortgage for value. Here the mortgage to McCormick was given to secure-to the extent of $1,500-a previous liability and indebtedness, and such as might be subsequently incurred.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature