Supreme Court of the United States

Summary

Supreme Court of the United States New York v. New Jersey (2023)

In sum, background principles of contract law, reinforced here by principles of state sovereignty and the fact that the States did not intend for the Compact to operate forever, indicate that New Jersey may unilaterally withdraw from the Waterfront Commission Compact. To be clear, the contract-law rule that we apply today governs compacts (like this Compact) that are silent as to unilateral withdrawal and that exclusively call for ongoing performance on an indefinite basis.
Source: Wikisource

Supreme Court of the United States New York v. New Jersey (2023)

In 1953, roughly 70% of waterfront employees worked on the New York side of the Port. But by 2018, according to New Jersey, more than 80% of work hours occurred on the New Jersey side, and more than 80% of the Port’s cargo flowed through the New Jersey side. New Jersey also came to view the Commission as ill-equipped to handle 21st-century security challenges and as a source of overregulation that impedes job growth.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature