Wiley Blount Rutledge, Fisher v. Pace — Dissent
“ That is, I regret to say, the con lusion to which I have been forced from the record as a whole that in the course of the colloquy and especially in the rapid succession of fines, commitment to jail, and order for removal from the courtroom, as well as in the unjudicial language employed by the judge, the trial court acted in the heat of temper and not in that calm control which the fair administration of judicial office commands under all circumstances.Lawyers owe a large, but not an obsequious, duty of respect to the court in its presence. ”
