Summary

William A. Fletcher Cetacean Community v. Bush — Opinion of the Court

It is obvious that an animal cannot function as a plaintiff in the same manner as a juridically competent human being. But we see no reason why Article III prevents Congress from authorizing a suit in the name of an animal, any more than it prevents suits brought in the name of artificial persons such as corporations, partnerships or trusts, and even ships, or of juridically incompetent persons such as infants, juveniles, and mental incompetents.
Source: Wikisource

William A. Fletcher Cetacean Community v. Bush — Opinion of the Court

The statute is set up to authorize "persons" to sue to protect animals whenever those animals are "endangered" or "threatened." Animals are not authorized to sue in their own names to protect themselves. There is no hint in the definition of "person" in § 1532 (13) that the "person" authorized to bring suit to protect an endangered or threatened species can be an animal that is itself endangered or threatened.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature