Summary

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Watts v. United States — Concurrence

I mean his NATURAL DEATH; which being a hidden operation of the mind, an overt act is any thing which legally proves the existence of such traitorous design and intention-I say that the design against the king's natural life, is the high treason under the first branch of the statute; and whatever is evidence, which may be legally laid before a jury to judge of the traitorous intention, is a legal overt act
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of William O. Douglas William O. Douglas Watts v. United States — Concurrence

Apel, 44 F.Supp. 592, 593 (D.C.N.D.Ill.1942) ; for declaring that 'President Wilson ought to be killed. It is a wonder some one has not done it already. If I had an opportunity, I would do it myself.' United States v. Stickrath, 242 F. 151, 152 (D.C.S.D.Ohio 1917) ; for declaring that 'Wilson is a wooden-headed son of a bitch. I wish Wilson was in hell, and if I had the power I would put him there,' Clark v.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature