Summary

William W. Smith St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co…

Now it is an unbending rule of construction that an exemption from taxation is strictissimi juris. As it is never created in the first instance by implication, so it is never extended by construction. A claim of this sort cannot be supported, unless the statute alleged to confer it is so plain as to leave no room for controversy. "In the construction of a charter, to be in doubt is to be resolved, and every resolution which springs from doubt is against the corporation."
Source: Wikisource

William W. Smith St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co…

The chancellor, as it appears from his written opinion, found that that part of the plaintiff's road in this State, and formerly known as the Cairo and Fulton road, had yielded by its operations a net income of ten per cent. per annum on the cost of construction and equipment. What we have already said renders it unnecessary to go into this question. In the very nature of things, it is impossible to do more than guess at it. It appears by the plaintiff's own proof that its officers cannot tell, save by an approximation, what the actual earnings of this part of the road are.
Source: Wikisource

William W. Smith St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co…

The rule of strict construction, universally applied to exemptions from taxation, demands that this provision shall be limited in its operation to the powers granted to the corporation. It cannot be supposed that the Legislature intended any laxity of construction in a manner so vital to the public interest as that of taxation.
But, by its charter, a limited and conditional exemption from taxation was granted to the Cairo and Fulton Company. It only remains to consider whether the plaintiff is the same corporation to which the grant was made, or has succeeded to its rights in this respect.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature