Summary

by John Marshall Harlan Emerson v. Senter — Opinion of the Court

It is true that, in many cases,-where, for instance, the surviving partner is not exercising due diligence in settling the partnership business, or is acting in bad faith,-the personal representative of the deceased partner may invoke the interference of a court of equity, and compel such a disposition of the partnership effects as will be jest and proper
Source: Wikisource

by John Marshall Harlan Emerson v. Senter — Opinion of the Court

If the intentional omission by the grantor of certain property from his schedule, and his appropriation of it to his own use, was such a fraud as would vitiate the deed, where the assignee or the preferred creditors have previous notice of such omission, that result cannot happen when they were ignorant of the fraud at the time they accepted the benefit of the conveyance.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature