Summary

by John Marshall Harlan Moyer v. Nichols — Opinion of the Court

Nichols, No. 251, on appeal, is affirmed on the authority of Pettibone v. Nichols, 203 U.S. 192, 51 L. ed. 148, 27 Sup. Ct. Rep. 111, from which, as to the facts or the questions involved, it does not differ. The orders in Pettibone v. Whitney, No. 265, Morey v. Whitney, No. 266, and Haywood v. Whitney, No. 267,-each of which cases is here upon writ of error to the supreme court of Idaho, involves the same question as those determined in Pettibone v. Nichols, and by agreement is to depend upon the judgment in that case,-must also be affirmed.
It is so ordered.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature