Matthew Brown Riddle

Portrait of Matthew Brown Riddle Matthew Brown Riddle,  Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. VII, Introductory Notice… (1885)

“ As regards the doctrine, polity, usages, and ethics expressed and implied in the Teaching, the reader can judge for himself. The writer is of the opinion that the work represents, on many of these points, only a very small fraction of the Christians during the second century, and that, while it casts some light upon usages of that period, it cannot be regarded as an authoritative witness concerning the universal faith and practice of believers at the date usually assigned to it. ”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Matthew Brown Riddle Matthew Brown Riddle,  Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. VII, Introductory Notice… (1885)

“ In the case of Barnabas, the resemblances can be accounted for (a) by accepting the priority of the Teaching, or (b) by assuming a common (earlier and unknown) source, or (c) by accepting the priority of Barnabas, and assuming such corruptions in the Greek copy of the Teaching as will account for the supposed marks of its priority. Despite the general adoption of (a) , there remains a strong probability that (b) is the correct solution of the problem. ”
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Matthew Brown Riddle Matthew Brown Riddle,  Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. VII, Introductory Notice… (1885)

“ All patristic scholars welcomed his work, which bore every mark of care and learning; showing the results of his contact, as a student, with German methods. Bishop Lightfoot and many others at once made use of this new material. The remaining contents of the Codex were named in the volume of Bryennios, and some interest awakened by the mention of the Teaching. The learned Metropolitan furnished new readings from other parts of the Codex to German scholars. At the close of 1883 he published in Constantinople the text of the Teaching, with prolegomena and notes. ”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature