United States District Court of the Eastern District of California, US District Court Jury Verdict SRF v Ananda 2002 (2002)
“ Innocent infringement - Innocent Infringement is the infringement caused without knowledge or awareness of such act. - "USLegal". The difference between a willful infringer and an innocent infringer is that while a willful infringer is liable for monetary damages, an innocent infringer can only be forced to stop using the mark. ”
United States District Court of the Eastern District of California, US District Court Jury Verdict SRF v Ananda 2002 (2002)
“ QUESTION NO. 5: (FAIR USE) For any work (s) that you find SRF owns a valid copyright, have Defendant (s) proven that any use made of the work (s) was a fair use? YES: ___X___ No: ______ If you answered “YES” to this question, please continue to Question No. 6. If you answered “NO” to this question, please continue to Question No. 7. QUESTION NO. 6: (WORKS SUBJECT TO FAIR USE DEFENSE) If you answered "yes" in response to Question No. 5, please identify the work (s) you find subject to the fair use defense: All works at issue: ______ ”
United States District Court of the Eastern District of California, US District Court Jury Verdict SRF v Ananda 2002 (2002)
“ YES: ___X___ NO: ______ c. Yogananda's writing (s) concerning the Second Coming of Christ. YES: ___X___ NO: ______ d. The six sound recordings of Yogananda's religious talks recorded between 1949 and 1952. ”
