Summary

Portrait of Abe Fortas Abe Fortas United Steelworkers of America v…

If we were to accept petitioner's urgent invitation to amend diversity jurisdiction so as to accommodate its case, we would be faced with difficulties which we could not adequately resolve. Even if the record here were adequate, we might well hesitate to assume that petitioner's situation is sufficiently representative or typical to form the predicate of a general principle. We should, for example, be obliged to fashion a test for ascertaining of which State the labor union is a citizen.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Abe Fortas Abe Fortas United Steelworkers of America v…

Whether unincorporated labor unions ought to be assimilated to the status of corporations for diversity purposes, how such citizenship is to be determined, and what if any related rules ought to apply, are decisions which we believe suited to the legislative and not the judicial branch, regardless of our views as to the intrinsic merits of petitioner's argument-merits stoutly attested by widespread support for the recognition of labor unions as juridical personalities.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Abe Fortas Abe Fortas United Steelworkers of America v…

Petitioner argues that one of the purposes underlying the jurisdiction-protection of the nonresident litigant from local prejudice-is especially applicable to the modern labor union. According to the argument, when the nonresident defendant is a major union, local juries may be tempted to favor local interests at its expense. Juries may also be influenced by the fear that unionization would adversely affect the economy of the community and its customs and practices in the field of race relations.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature