Annabelle Clinton Imber, Jones v. State (2004)
“ We recognize the possibility that one may be in possession of an amount of a controlled substance sufficient to permit knowledge of its presence and yet still not be in possession of a useable amount. ”
Annabelle Clinton Imber, Jones v. State (2004)
“ As reflected in the decisions by the Arizona appellate courts, in order to sustain a conviction for possession of narcotics when the amount of narcotic is so small as not to be within the realm of an uninformed layman's knowledge of its usability, there must be evidence as to the sufficiency of the narcotic to be usable under the known practice of narcotic addicts. ”
Annabelle Clinton Imber, Jones v. State (2004)
“ ANABELLE CLINTON IMBER, Justice, dissenting. Today the majority opinion overrules Harbison v. State, 302 Ark. 315, 790 S.W.2d 146 (1990) , by adopting an analysis specifically rejected by the majority opinion in that case. ”
