Summary

Archelaus Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. VI, Acts of Disputation… (1885)

It is written, that “death reigned from Adam to Moses.” Archelaus said: And consequently it has an end, because it has had a beginning in time. [8] And this saying is also true, that “death is swallowed up in victory.” [9] It is apparent, then, that death cannot be unbegotten, seeing that it is shown to have both a beginning and an end. Manes said: But in that way it would also follow that God was its maker. Archelaus said: By no means; away with such a supposition! “For God made not death; neither hath He pleasure in the destruction of the living.”
Source: Wikisource

Archelaus Ante-Nicene Fathers Vol. VI, Acts of Disputation… (1885)

Nay, but you have put forward those allegations in such a manner, as if they were to serve you for a demonstration of an unbegotten root. Nevertheless the positions which we have discussed above may suffice us, for by these we have shown most fully that it is impossible for the substances of two unbegotten natures to exist together.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature