Arthur Goldberg

“ United States, 350 U.S. 214, 76 S.Ct. 292, 100 L.Ed. 233, may ever support an injunction against a state official who has received evidence illegally obtained by federal officers even though 'there is no evidence of a purpose to avoid federal requirements and the information has not been acquired by the state official in violation of a federal court order.' For me consideration of that question is obviated by the commendably broad reading which the New York Court of Appeals has given this Court's decision in Mapp v. ”

“ In stating my position I rely on the New York Court of Appeals' announced view that it regards Mapp as extending to the 'fruit of the poisonous tree,' a holding arrived at on facts similar to those involved here. People v. ”

“ Loria, 10 N.Y.2d 368, 223 N.Y.S.2d 462, 179 N.E.2d 478 (1961) ; People v. O'Neill, 11 N.Y.2d 148, 227 N.Y.S.2d 416, 182 N.E.2d 95 (1962) ; People v. Rodriguez, 11 N.Y.2d 279, 229, N.Y.S.2d 353, 183 N.E.2d 651 (1962) .↑ Compare Bloodgood v. ”