Summary

Portrait of Arthur Goldberg Arthur Goldberg,  Rudolph v. Alabama — Dissent

“ Can the permissible aims of punishment (e. g., deterrence, isolation, rehabilitation) [5] be achieved as effectively by punishing rape less severely than by death (e. g., by life imprisonment) ; [6] if so, does the imposition of the death penalty for rape constitute 'unnecessary cruelty?' [7]
Notes
↑ The United Nations recently conducted a survey on the laws, regulations and practices relating to capital punishment throughout the world.
”
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature