Summary

Thurgood Marshall Furman v. Georgia — Concurring Opinion

The criminal acts with which we are confronted are ugly, vicious, reprehensible acts. Their sheer brutality cannot and should not be minimized. But, we are not called upon to condone the penalized conduct; we are asked only to examine the penalty imposed on each of the petitioners and to determine whether or not it violates the Eighth Amendment. The question then is not whether we condone rape or murder, for surely we do not; it is whether capital punishment is "a punishment no longer consistent with our own self-respect" [2] and, therefore, violative of the Eighth Amendment.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature