Summary

Portrait of Benjamin N. Cardozo Benjamin N. Cardozo Chisholm v. Gilmer — Opinion of the Court

Those issuing from the Supreme Court shall bear teste of the Chief Justice of the United States, or, when that office is vacant, of the associate justice next in precedence, and those issuing from a district court shall bear teste of the judge, or, when that office is vacant, of the clerk thereof.' We do not essay a definition of the word 'process' in every context.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Benjamin N. Cardozo Benjamin N. Cardozo Chisholm v. Gilmer — Opinion of the Court

For present purposes it is enough to say that a notice of motion, if process at all, is not process issuing from a court, and assuredly is not a writ. [3] Only writs or processes so issuing are governed by the statute. This is the view expressed more than thirty years ago by Judge McDowell in two cases (Leas & McVitty v. Merriman, supra, and Schofield v. Palmer (C.C.) 134 F. 753) , which did much, we may be confident, to guide the conduct of the federal bar in adhering to the Virginia practice. It is the view expressed by Judge (later Mr. Justice) Sanford in the District Court of Tennessee.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature