Summary

Byron White Waldron v. Lines, Inc. — Dissent

Likewise, petitioner argues, an order of a ship's officer assigning too few men to do a particular task creates an unseaworthy condition because the ship is under-manned in this specific respect. He challenges therefore the prevailing rule in the Second Circuit requiring plaintiff in situations such as this to prove not only that the order was improvident but also that the officer issuing it was not equal in competence to ordinary men in the calling.
Source: Wikisource

Byron White Waldron v. Lines, Inc. — Dissent

The majority agrees with the petitioner, at least where the improvident order requires the performance of tasks whose safe completion calls for the assignment of more men. The majority holds that the case should have gone to the jury on both the negligence and unseaworthiness claims.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature