Summary

Portrait of Charles Bradlaugh Charles Bradlaugh The Channel Tunnel: Ought the Democracy to Oppose Or Support It… (1887)

Commerce is an eloquent peace preacher; the frequent and more complete intermingling of unarmed peoples begets distaste for war; national prejudices die away under frequent contact; explanations are easier as peoples know one another better. I am in favor of this Channel tunnel because it will give to us in this island easier means of seeing our European brethren in their own cities. It will afford to the folk of France the opportunity of knowing for themselves that the English workmen do not desire quarrel or war.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Charles Bradlaugh Charles Bradlaugh The Channel Tunnel: Ought the Democracy to Oppose Or Support It… (1887)

My short answer to this wild contention is that all intercourse between nations would be impossible and life would be unendurable, if in time of "profound peace" we are always to treat neighboring nations as ever ready without provocation to suddenly assail our shores in order to rob and destroy. The European experience of the past century is entirely against the monstrous contention put forward by Lord Wolseley that France might suddenly surprise us whilst we were in peace and alliance with her and all European powers.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Charles Bradlaugh Charles Bradlaugh The Channel Tunnel: Ought the Democracy to Oppose Or Support It… (1887)

I submit that this is really carrying panic to madness point, for, if an invading army, large enough and strong enough to capture Dover, had landed otherwise than through the tunnel, our state must have become so hopeless that discussion as to how such an enemy would get supplies and reinforcement would cease to be material. Such an army so invading England, otherwise than by the tunnel, would be as dangerous to England whether or not the tunnel existed.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature