Charles Henry Hartshorne, ../../ (1846)
“ The bishop had not received the royal permission to erect his new house, and the king must therefore have taken up his abode in the old family dwelling of the bishop's ancestors, the venerable remains of which still exist. In the ensuing year 1283, he was again at Acton Burnell, for nearly six weeks, namely, from the 29th of September to the 12th of November [21] . The chancellor had not yet received the royal licence to crenelate his dwelling, and the king on all these occasions must have resided in some other building, most probably in the one to which the attention has just been directed. ”
