Clarence Thomas, Gonzales v. Carhart — Concurring Opinion (2007)
“ I join the Court's opinion because it accurately applies current jurisprudence, including Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992) . I write separately to reiterate my view that the Court's abortion jurisprudence, including Casey and Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) , has no basis in the Constitution. ”
