Summary

David Davis Bank of the Republic v. Millard…

If such a result should follow the giving of checks, it is easy to see that bankers would be compelled to abandon altogether the business of keeping deposit accounts for their customers. If, then, the bank did not contract with the holder of the check to pay it at the time it was given, how can it be said that it owes any duty to the holder until the check is presented and accepted? The right of the depositor, as was said by an eminent judge, [4] is a chose in action, and his check does not transfer the debt, or give a lien upon it to a third person without the assent of the depositary.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature