Summary

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Atchison Company v. Matthews — Opinion of the Court

As individuals, we may think it better that the legislature prescribe the specific duties which the corporations must perform. We may think it better that the legislation should be like that of Missouri, prescribing an absolute liability, instead of that of Kansas, making the fact of fire prima facie evidence of negligence. But clearly, as a court, we may not interpose our personal views as to the wisdom or policy of either form of legislation. It cannot be too often said that forms are matters of legislative consideration; results and power only are to be considered by the courts.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Atchison Company v. Matthews — Opinion of the Court

If, in order to accomplish a given beneficial result,-a resuit which depends on the action of a corporation,-the legislature has the power to prescribe a specific duty and punish a failure to comply therewith by a penalty, either double damages or attorney's fees, has it not equal power to prescribe the same penalty for failing to accomplish the same result, leaving to the corporation the selection of the means it deems best therefor?
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Atchison Company v. Matthews — Opinion of the Court

Thus, when the legislature imposes on railroad corporations a double liability for stock killed by passing trains, it says, in effect, that if suit be brought against a railroad company for stock killed by one of its trains, it must enter into the courts under conditions different from those resting on ordinary suitors. If it is beaten in the suit, it must pay, not only the damage which it has done, but twice that amount. If it succeeds, it recovers nothing.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature