Summary

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Hartranft v. Meyer (149 U.S. 544…

The end of litigation, so much to be desired, is not fully satisfied by the close of the particular lawsuit, but implies that the question involved therein is settled; so settled, that all parties may adjust their dealings and conduct accordingly. A change in the personnel of a court should not mean a shift in the law. Stare decisis is the rule, and not the exception.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Hartranft v. Meyer (149 U.S. 544…

The jury are instructed that there is a distinction properly to be made between 'trimmings' and materials out of which to manufacture trimmings, and, if the articles in suit are not trimmings in the sense of being completely fabricated as such, but required skill and labor to cut, fit, fold, sew, or fashion them into trimmings, then they must find for the defendant.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of David Josiah Brewer David Josiah Brewer Hartranft v. Meyer (149 U.S. 544…

This point which I have just read and the next one embody the proposition advanced by defendant's counsel and discussed by them before the jury, that the chinas and marcelines here in question cannot be regarded as within the term 'trimmings,' as employed in the act of congress, because they are imported by the piece, and before the material is actually applied to use in the making or ornamenting of hats, bonnets, and hoods the pieces have to be cut into smaller pieces and made into certain forms.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature