George Shiras, Jr.

“ The proof tended to show that most of the trimmings in question had more or less specific commercial names, which aided to distinguish one from another, and that 'trimmings' was their general name, and not their specific one. ”

“ Rep. 979, in which the facts were substantially the same with those disclosed in the present record, that goods intended for trimmings for hats, bonnets, and hoods, and found by the jury to be chiefly so used, were properly assessed for duty, under Schedule N, at 20 per centum ad valorem, notwithstanding that such goods were composed wholly or chiefly of silk. In so ruling we considered ourselves bound by our previous decisions. ”