E. Raymond Hall, Conspecificity of two pocket mice…
“ Examination (by Hall) of the specimens reveals that the differences relied upon by Burt and Hooper to differentiate the two species are well within the range of individual variation. For example, the variation (5.3 to 5.6 mm.) in width of the supraoccipital is less than in each of some other series of specimens of equal age of P. g. artus from other localities.Also, there is geographic variation in the mice here assigned to the subspecies P. g. artus; skulls are smaller in the northern part of the geographic range and become gradually larger toward the south. ”
