Summary

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren Jacobs v. New York — Dissent

After a person has been convicted under a statute which limits his right of expression, his subsequent conduct will be significantly chilled by the conviction on his record. Particularly where, as in this case, the convictions stem from conduct which is directly in line with appellants' profession as movie exhibitors, they may justifably fear that any future conduct running the danger of infringing the statute will be more harshly treated because of the previous unreviewed conviction.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature