Summary

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren Kramer v. Union Free School District N15…

Statutes granting the franchise to residents on a selective basis always pose the danger of denying some citizens any effective voice in the governmental affairs which substantially affect their lives. [7] Therefore, if a challenged state statute grants the right to vote to some bona fide residents of requisite age and citizenship and denies the franchise to others, the Court must determine whether the exclusions are necessary to promote a compelling state interest.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren Kramer v. Union Free School District N15…

The need for exacting judicial scrutiny of statutes distributing the franchise is undiminished simply because, under a different statutory scheme, the offices subject to election might have been filled through appointment. [11] States do have latitude in determining whethe certain public officials shall be selected by election or chosen by appointment and whether various questions shall be submitted to the voters. In fact, we have held that where a county school board is an administrative, not legislative, body, its members need not be elected.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren Kramer v. Union Free School District N15…

Appellees argue that it is necessary to limit the franchise to those 'primarily interested' in school affairs because 'the ever increasing complexity of the many interacting phases of the school system and structure make it extremely difficult for the electorate fully to understand the whys and wherefores of the detailed operations of the school system.' Appellees say that many communications of school boards and school administrations are sent home to the parents through the district pupils and are 'not broadcast to the general public'
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature