Summary

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark Wieman v. Updegraff — Opinion of the Court

There can be do dispute about the consequences visited upon a person excluded from public employment on disloyalty grounds. In the view of the community, the stain is a deep one; indeed, it has become a badge of infamy. Especially is this so in time of cold war and hot emotions when 'each man begins to eye his neighbor as a possible enemy.' [4] Yet under the Oklahoma Act, the fact of association alone determines disloyalty and disqualification; it matters not whether association existed innocently or knowingly.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Tom C. Clark Tom C. Clark Wieman v. Updegraff — Opinion of the Court

For, under the statute before us, the fact of membership alone disqualifies. If the rule be expressed as a presumption of disloyalty, it is a conclusive one.
But membership may be innocent. A state servant may have joined a proscribed organization unaware of its activities and purposes. In recent years, many completely loyal persons have severed organizational ties after learning for the first time of the character of groups to which they had belonged.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature