Summary

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren United States v. Durham Lumber Company…

If we are to equate the subcontractor's interest with something it is not, it would be much more appropriate, in terms of similarity, to equate it with the usual mechanic's lien of a subcontractor on the owner's property being improved-which of course is not the general contractor's property, and which could not be taken by the United States under a lien against the general contractor.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren United States v. Durham Lumber Company…

It found that the North Carolina law provides as follows: Subcontractors who have not been paid by the general contractor have a direct, independent cause of action against the owner to the extent of any amount due under the general construction contract, and any money owed by the owner under the construction contract must first be used to satisfy subcontractors' claims of which the owner has notice.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Earl Warren Earl Warren United States v. Durham Lumber Company…

Therefore, concluded the court, since under North Carolina law the taxpayers possessed merely a right to the residue of the fund, and since the Government's tax lien attached to the property interests of the taxpayers as defined by state law, the Government can recover only 'so much of the construction price as will remain unpaid after the owners have deducted a sum sufficient to pay the subcontractors.' Id., at page 575.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature