Summary

Portrait of Benjamin N. Cardozo Benjamin N. Cardozo Norfolk Railway Company v. North Carolina ex rel…

Accountants for the railway criticize the studies and analyses with the accompanying computations as defective and misleading. They also take the position that there is no method of allocating revenues with any greater approach to certainty than by means of a mileage prorate. Whether for that reason or some other, they have not made an attempt to ascertain receipts, no matter how approximately, by any other method, as assuredly they would have tried to do if the statutory formula had been abolished altogether.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Benjamin N. Cardozo Benjamin N. Cardozo Norfolk Railway Company v. North Carolina ex rel…

We are unable to accept the argument for the appellant that its burden was discharged when it gave evidence of the ratio between actual and average expenses while keeping silent as to the ratio between actual and average receipts. The statutory formula is not framed on an assumption that gross operating revenues are uniform actually for every mile throughout the system. It is not framed on an assumption that for every mile of the system there is uniformity of expense.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature