Summary

Edward Douglass White Howard v. De Cordova — Opinion of the Court

Besides this decisive consideration, the proceedings in the state court, whatever may have been their efficacy as a defense to the charges of fraud contained in the bill, as to which we express no opinion, were not adequate to defeat the jurisdiction of the circuit court of the United States. In other words, they address themselves, not to the jurisdiction of the court, but to the merits of the cause.
Source: Wikisource

Edward Douglass White Howard v. De Cordova — Opinion of the Court

He charged that the defendants claimed title under the judgment rendered in that suit, but that they had no title because he, Newell, had never resided in the state of Texas, had not authorized any attorney to appear for him in the suit, and that, therefore, the proceedings in McGrael v. Newell were as to him res inter alios acta, and wholly void.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature