Summary

Portrait of Edward Terry Sanford Edward Terry Sanford Leiter v. United States — Opinion of the Court

That is, although a lump sum appropriation had meanwhile been made for the rental expenses of the Veterans' Bureau for the next fiscal year-in which no reference was made to these specific leases-the leases were not continued under this appropriation for the next year, either by a specific agreement to that effect or by the occupation of the premises. So, the Government did not become liable for the payment of rent after the surrender of the premises.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Edward Terry Sanford Edward Terry Sanford Leiter v. United States — Opinion of the Court

The leases which were for space in an office building, were made by the trustees and the Treasury Department, in 1920 and 1921, for terms of four and five years, for the use of the Bureau of War Risk Insurance and other Federal agencies that were subsequently merged, in August, 1921, in the Veterans' Bureau. [2] The leases provided for stipulated annual rentals, to be paid in monthly installments.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature