Summary

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Garner v. Board of Public Works of Los Angeles…

Giving full scope to the selective processes open to our municipalities and States in securing competent and reliable functionaries free from allegiance to any alien political authority, I do not think that it is consonant with the Due Process Clause for men to be asked, on pain of giving up public employment, to swear to something they cannot be expected to know.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Garner v. Board of Public Works of Los Angeles…

How can anyone be sure that an organization with which he affiliates will not at some time in the future be found by a State or National official to advocate overthrow of government by 'unlawful means'? All but the hardiest may well hesitate to join organizations if they know that by such a proscription they will be permanently disqualified from public employment. These are considerations that cut deep into the traditions of our people.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Garner v. Board of Public Works of Los Angeles…

Surely, a government could not exclude from public employment members of a minority group merely because they are odious to the majority, nor restrict such employment, say, to nativeborn citizens. To describe public employment as a privilege does not meet the problem.
This line of reasoning gives the direction, I believe, for dealing with the issues before us. A municipality like Los Angeles ought to be allowed adequate scope in seeking to elicit information about its employees and from them.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature