Summary

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Irvin v. Dowd (366 U.S. 717) — Concurrence

These rudimentary conditions for determining guilt are inevitably wanting if the jury which is to sit in judgment on a fellow human being comes to its task with its mind ineradicably poisoned against him. How can fallible men and women reach a disinterested verdict based exclusively on what they heard in court when, before they entered the jury box, their minds were saturated by press and radio for months preceding by matter designed to establish the guilt of the accused.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Irvin v. Dowd (366 U.S. 717) — Concurrence

But this is, unfortunately, not an isolated case that happened in Evansville, Indiana, nor an atypical miscarriage of justice due to anticipatory r ial by newspapers instead of trial in court before a jury.
More than one student of society has expressed the view that not the least significant test of the quality of a civilization is its treatment of those charged with crime, particularly with offenses which arouse the passions of a community.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature