Summary

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Poulos v. New Hampshire — Concurrence

Poulos v. New Hampshire
Argued: Feb. 3, 1953. --- Decided: April 27, 1953
Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER, concurring in the result.
I am constrained to protest against the Court's discussion under first because it deals with an issue that is not here.
In no area of adjudication is the adage 'silence is golden' more pertinent, when there is no duty to speak, than in the series of problems to which a judicial reconciliation between liberty and order gives rise. It is more than a counsel of wisdom. When there is no duty to speak on such issues there is a duty not to speak.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Poulos v. New Hampshire — Concurrence

In reaching this conclusion the New Hampshire Supreme Court did not construe the ordinance; it did not, in the technical meaning of the phrase, apply the statute. 'We see no reason', said that Court, 'for overruling the law as stated in this jurisdiction that a wrongful refusal to license is not a bar to a prosecution for acting without a license.' State v. Poulos, supra, 97 N.H. at page 354, 88 A.2d at page 861. What the Supreme Court of New Hampshire enforced was not a part of the licensing ordinance but the general procedural law of New Hampshire.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature