Summary

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Uveges v. Pennsylvania — Dissent

Intervention by this Court in the administration of the criminal justice of a State has all the disadvantages of interference from without. Whatever short-cut to relief may be had in a particular case, it is calculated to beget misunderstanding and friction and to that extent detracts from those imponderables which are the ultimate reliance of a civilized system of law.
Source: Wikisource

Portrait of Felix Frankfurter Felix Frankfurter Uveges v. Pennsylvania — Dissent

Law is essentially legalistic the sense that observance of wellrecognized procedure is, on balance, socially desirable. In the well-being of a federalism like ours observance of what on casual view may appear as a sterile technicality is important whenever this Court is brought in potential conflict with State courts. Especially is it important as to those vast reaches of the criminal law which are exclusively within State domain, and which are therefore not subject to the supervision which this Court may exercise over the lower federal courts.
Source: Wikisource

Get perspective with Kwize: daily news enlightened by great literature