First National Bank of Claremore v…
“ Mayes called the court's attention to the fact that the supreme court had held that the issue of fraud had not been presented by the pleadings, and they asked leave to file amended answers to the intervention of Keys & Company, in which they denied the existence of any debt from Mayes to Keys & Company, averring that the mortgage was defectively acknowledged, was fraudulent in law and in fact, or, if originally good, had lost its validity against creditors of Mayes because he had been permitted to retain possession of the herd. ”
